By Daniel Hawes
I recently came across an article in the June 2010 issue of Motor Trend magazine about the unintended consequences that the Toyota acceleration fiasco may have on the rest of the car driving / loving population. The author, Angus Mackenzie, asserts that the only finite way to stop the finger pointing after car accidents or car problems is the installation of a “black box” system, much like the FAA mandates for airplanes. Whether a driver points a finger at the other driver, weather conditions, failing automotive hardware, or even malfunctioning automotive computer software, (as was the key in the Toyota fiasco) it does seem a logical solution provided that it could be implemented in a cost effective way for all involved. Mr. Mackenzie appears to propose a potentially great solution to avoid these problems and the subsequent scams that ensue, however, if the implementation were to occur, it could possibly open up a whole new can of worms that none of us are ready for.
Having data tracking devices installed in all news cars would alleviate many of the questions when things go wrong, however, where Mr. Mackenzie loses me is in the second half of his article, where he lists all the other “benefits” that a device such as this could produce. This is where, in my opinion, a line becomes blurred between beneficial, and impeding in our personal lives and liberty. The potential consequences could be devastating to many if some of these ideas are implemented through governmental legislation.
He first begins explaining the assistance that these devices could provide to insurance companies and law enforcement. For instance, if there is real-time tracking, then tickets for speeding and other moving traffic violations could instantly be issued, taking a burden off law enforcement to handle more pressing “crimes.” Mr. Mackenzie also includes the advantages to both the insurance companies as well as policyholders. Insurance companies would have the ability to truly and accurately assess responsible driving and offer premium discounts for those who apply. Conversely, they would have the capability to fine or impose higher premiums on the habitual speeder for instance – even if no ticket was ever issued. Continue Reading
